ANarchy

so if we fight about anarchist concepts;we cant arrive nothing.we have a synthesis!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wheelchairman

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism

---

Thanks for the Info. an Intelligent person like yourself shall teach a slow student like myself a lesson to be learned. Thus far as the Universe is concerned. :) :D :cool:

If there was an anarchist party, what animal do you think they'd use?

poff couldnt you find a better question? :D:p:cool:

Not really. Most people that describe themselves as Anarchists are actually just idealist socialists. Pyrimid makes a legit argument but its neither here nor there. If thats your definition of an anarchist, then you believe in revolution. Which is fine, many great things have come from revolution and I think to an extent we all believe in revolting when necessary. But how does that really make you an anarchist?

But think about it, if there was an american anarchy party, what animal would they choose? Reps are elephants, dems are donkeys...maybe the anarchist anteater? or would they be super hardcore and be all like, we believe in no government, so no animal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Al Coholic

Not really. Most people that describe themselves as Anarchists are actually just idealist socialists. Pyrimid makes a legit argument but its neither here nor there. If thats your definition of an anarchist, then you believe in revolution. Which is fine, many great things have come from revolution and I think to an extent we all believe in revolting when necessary. But how does that really make you an anarchist?

But think about it, if there was an american anarchy party, what animal would they choose? Reps are elephants, dems are donkeys...maybe the anarchist anteater? or would they be super hardcore and be all like, we believe in no government, so no animal.

---

Well, you wouldn't be an anarchist if you didn't believe in revolution. So at least this satisfies the 'second order' condition.

Also, having animals as your party mascot is just a populist and a marketing tactic to identify or to brand oneself. It's not like it was here since the first age of Governments... So no, of course anarchists wouldn't want of that shit.

hehe hey dudes,i guess everybody thinks like that"hey man a perfect anarchist is me" and other man"no dude,im the super anarchist" blablabla.hey leave this comic argument and tell me how can we contribute to anarchism philosophy with our ideas.ok? talk about workers,talk about smashing people talk about governments and bourgeous's immoral power,talk about capitalism and iemperialism's slaves!or dont talk with comic accusations.if you all do it ,nothing is change!tell me is the private property not theft??? tell me ; arent your governments making new slaves????government or a chief or a guider makes you slave and it kills your free soul so we cant accept it.your master is you.only you but dont forget if you can be free,you try to work to freedom of other people!ok?now these speechs re only in communism or socialism...i dont mean these views(soc. or comm.) re bad but these views cant see the holiness of individualism.so anarchism's centre is individual!even anarchist philosophers re still debatin' on this subject!...... so we can still debate!and im concerning now:will you still continue to accuse to yourselves?

"anarquismo sin adjetives"
maybe you join this view but i guess im not.anyway i advise to you read the manifest of bakunin in Germany(1868)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metalmania

"anarquismo sin adjetives"
maybe you join this view but i guess im not.anyway i advise to you read the manifest of bakunin in Germany(1868)

---

Not a bad book if you ignore the blatant racism. Another book that blames everyone’s problems on another race.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Al Coholic

If there was an anarchist party, what animal do you think they'd use?

---

Roadkill!.....