sorry, someone had to do it sooner or later
Ok, I posted something in two separate topics to you and while you continued to reply to the topics, you failed to reply to my posts. I'd like to think that was because you just didn't see them, but the fact that it happened twice kind of leads me to believe otherwise.
In the abortion topic (the first one that is) you said something along the lines of casual sex = natural. I agreed with this fact but I stated something like "casual sex IS natural, but today's society isn't". Your response was:
which is, in all honesty, a very good point. However, you've also said:Originally Posted by SicN Twisted
andOriginally Posted by SicN Twisted
Now, either this means that your saying today's world is natural is incorrect, or it's saying that anarchy is NOT the most natural simply because it's not what evolved. Also, if anarchy is the most natural (i.e. 100% natural) does that mean that today's society is only 99% natural? Also, if countries are not natural, then why are they what evolved? If that's true then that voids the argument that the only thing that's unnatural is what can't occur.Originally Posted by SicN Twisted
Also, by this logic, the opinion that "casual sex is natural" can technically be cancelled by the fact that someone choosing to remain celibate until marriage is just as natural, simply because the only things that aren't natural are the things that can't occur.





Reply With Quote
