Fair or unfair. And why.
Fair or unfair. And why.
Seth Putnam will always live.
http://www.prizerebel.com/index.php?r=298596
Seth Putnam will always live.
http://www.prizerebel.com/index.php?r=298596
LOL, was bighead giving you a run for your money?
i'm against Death Penalty, just think in how many cases we would kill the wrong person . . .
justice is not ALWAYS right . . it's complicated.
and we don't have the straight to take someone's life . . . even though some persons deserve that . .
Brian * ]
~ARGENTINA~
i agree. i think that if they get killed, they actually get off easy, because as you said, in prison they would suffer more for longer. this is really based off if they were to murder someone, because then in prison they would (eventually) regret killing them, because now theyre stuck in prison for life. and for killing someone, they deserve that
lolz inorite?
I'm against capital punishment, but not because of the reason most stated here (well, not primarily). I personally don't have strong objections to eye-for-an-eye justice. I'm against it because it's useless. Without a doubt, the point of it is to deter would-be murderers from murdering. Since this hasn't and will never work, death penalty has no real reason to exist anymore.
Fair. A deliberate murder should be punished by the death penalty.
Why? Because they can masturbate in a jail.
Life is precious. Murderers are anti-life. Their life is worth nothing. Therefore executioner is not anti-life.
I'm quite surprised that I'm pro death penalty because a lot of retards are pro as well.
I believe in rehabilitation.
Death penalty is not a rational solution to the problem of punishing killers.
Sorry, but I call bull.
Not all, but many murderers are not intent on killing people. If put in a prison rehabilitation program and consequently shows positive progression, I see no reason as to why the convict can't make a contribution in society again.
People deserve a second chance.