See if you can spot the error in this article...

[Floyd the Barber]

Should be VERY obvious

http://www.billboard.com/bb/daily/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000759950

get your facts straight, Billboard!

[Jojan]

"The group's most recent was 2003's "Conspiracy of One,"..."

[GBH2]

i dunno..
i'm to lazy to read the whole thing

[Floyd the Barber]

"The group's most recent was 2003's "Conspiracy of One,"..."

Yep, that was it.

[Obie2trice]

debuted at no.9? Was that one meant for Splinter or Co1, cause that is pretty good

[Tijs]

A while ago I had a Dutch interview about the Offspring (pre-Splinter). Apperently they had some trouble remembering the name of the album Conspiracy of One, as they called it 'Conspiracy of Hope' two or three times and 'Conspiracy of Love' once or twice. It's one thing to put the album name wrong once, but to do it at least 3 times with two different titles is another thing.

[leo3375]

*twitching in utter shock* Must… kill…

*ahem* CO1 came out in 2000 and debuted at #9. Splinter came out in 2003 and debuted at #39.

[Floyd the Barber]

*twitching in utter shock* Must… kill…

*ahem* CO1 came out in 2000 and debuted at #9. Splinter came out in 2003 and debuted at #39.

Actually, Splinter debuted at #30.

[leo3375]

Actually, Splinter debuted at #30.

My bad. :p I knew it was in the #30–40 range.

[nameless]

i noticed it too for what its worth!

[Tired_Of_You]

i dunno..
i'm to lazy to read the whole thing

What's the point in answering in the thread if you didn't even read the article?



It's not the first time I see this mistake, on some sites, it's not even written that they released an album in 2003.

[vintagepunkrock7]

well i know splinter didnt do too well, but i didnt think it was that bad as to go unnoticed by something like billboard, they have to really be getting lazy over there or someone isnt doing their homework lol. i thought it was a pretty good album, i enjoyed it at least lol.

[ATOM_01]

splinter achieved number 9 status in australia i believe